🔗 Share this article

Over an extended period, intimidating communications recurred. At first, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and a former defense officer, later from the authorities. In the end, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh claims he was ordered to the police station and told clearly: keep quiet or experience severe repercussions.

Shaikh is one of many opposing a multimillion-dollar redevelopment plan where one of India's largest slums – an iconic Mumbai neighborhood – is scheduled to be demolished and transformed by a corporate giant.

"The culture of this area is exceptional in the planet," explains Shaikh. "Yet the plan aims to dismantle our community and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of this community stand in sharp opposition to the towering buildings and luxury apartments that dominate the settlement. Dwellings are assembled randomly and typically lacking adequate facilities, informal businesses release harmful emissions and the atmosphere is saturated with the unpleasant stench of exposed drainage.

For certain residents, the promise of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of high-end towers, well-maintained green spaces, shiny shopping centers and residences with two toilets is an optimistic future come true.

"There's no sufficient health services, roads or sewage systems and there's nowhere for children to play," explains A Selvin Nadar, fifty-six, who moved from his home state in that period. "The sole solution is to tear it all down and build us new homes."

Resident Opposition

But others, including Shaikh, are resisting the redevelopment.

None deny that Dharavi, long neglected as informal housing, is desperately requiring economic input and modernization. Yet they are concerned that this project – lacking resident participation – might transform premium city property into a luxury development, evicting the marginalized, working-class residents who have lived there since the nineteenth century.

It was these excluded, displaced people who built up the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of self-reliance and economic productivity, whose economic value is estimated at between one million dollars and $2m annually, making it among the globe's biggest unregulated sectors.

Resettlement Issues

Of the roughly a million people living in the crowded 220-hectare zone, less than 50% will be eligible for new homes in the project, which is projected to take a significant period to finish. The remainder will be transferred to barren areas and coastal regions on the remote edges of the metropolis, risking break up a historic neighborhood. Certain individuals will not get housing at all.

People eligible to remain in Dharavi will be provided apartments in tower blocks, a major break from the evolved, shared lifestyle of residing and operating that has maintained the community for many years.

Commercial activities from tailoring to clay work and material recovery are expected to decrease in quantity and be relocated to a specific "business area" separated from homes.

Livelihood Crisis

For those such as this protester, a workshop owner and long-time of his family to call home the slum, the project presents a fundamental risk. His makeshift, three-storey workshop makes apparel – sharp blazers, premium outerwear, fashionable garments – sold in high-end shops in south Mumbai and abroad.

Household members resides in the rooms below and his workers and garment workers – laborers from north India – also sleep in the same building, permitting him to manage costs. Outside this community, housing costs are frequently tenfold as high for basic accommodation.

Pressure and Coercion

At the administrative buildings close by, a conceptual model of the redevelopment plan illustrates an alternative outlook. Slickly dressed inhabitants gather on bicycles and e-vehicles, acquiring western-style baked goods and breakfast items and enlisting beverages on a patio near a coffee shop and Ice-Cream. It is a world away from the affordable idli sambar breakfast and 5-rupee chai that supports the neighborhood.

"This represents no development for our community," explains Shaikh. "This constitutes an enormous real estate deal that will make it unaffordable for our community to continue."

Furthermore, there's skepticism of the corporate group. Managed by a prominent businessman – among the country's wealthiest and a supporter of the government head – the corporation has faced accusations of crony capitalism and financial impropriety, which it rejects.

Even as the state government calls it a collaborative effort, the business group invested nearly a billion dollars for its majority share. A lawsuit stating that the redevelopment was improperly granted to the business group is under review in India's supreme court.

Sustained Harassment

Since they began to actively protest the redevelopment, local opponents state they have been faced ongoing efforts of harassment and intimidation – involving communications, clear intimidation and insinuations that criticizing the initiative was tantamount to anti-national sentiment – by people they assert work for the corporate group.

Part of the group alleged to have delivering warnings is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c